>
#political-science
,
#legal
>
Explain to them with the aid of decided case's and relevant sections of the 1999 constitution, any 5 reasons why democratic government is preferred to military rule in Nigeria?
Anonymous
more than 1 week ago
Explain to them with the aid of decided case's and relevant sections of the 1999 constitution, any 5 reasons why democratic government is preferred to military rule in Nigeria?
1 view
1 view
2 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
more than 1 week ago
1. Protection of fundamental human rights: Under a democratic government, citizens are guaranteed certain fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of association, and the right to a fair trial. In the case of Military Governor of Lagos State v. Ojukwu (1986), the Supreme Court held that the military government's actions violated the fundamental human rights of the citizens. This protection of human rights is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Chapter IV.
2. Rule of law: In a democratic government, the rule of law is upheld, and all citizens are equal before the law. This ensures that there is accountability and transparency in governance. In the case of Attorney General of Lagos State v. Attorney General of the Federation (2004), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the rule of law in a democratic society. This principle is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Section 1.
3. Separation of powers: In a democratic government, there is a clear separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. This ensures a system of checks and balances, preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful. In the case of A.G. Federation v. A.G. Abia State (2001), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the separation of powers in a democratic system. This principle is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Sections 4, 5, and 6.
4. Accountability and transparency: In a democratic government, leaders are accountable to the people through regular elections and mechanisms for oversight. This ensures that leaders are held accountable for their actions and decisions. In the case of A.G. Federation v. A.G. Abia State (2002), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of accountability and transparency in governance. This principle is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Section 15.
5. Economic development: Democratic governments are more likely to promote economic development and growth compared to military rule. This is because democratic governments are more stable, predictable, and conducive to investment. In the case of A.G. Federation v. A.G. Abia State (2003), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of economic development in a democratic society. This principle is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Section 16.
2. Rule of law: In a democratic government, the rule of law is upheld, and all citizens are equal before the law. This ensures that there is accountability and transparency in governance. In the case of Attorney General of Lagos State v. Attorney General of the Federation (2004), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the rule of law in a democratic society. This principle is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Section 1.
3. Separation of powers: In a democratic government, there is a clear separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. This ensures a system of checks and balances, preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful. In the case of A.G. Federation v. A.G. Abia State (2001), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the separation of powers in a democratic system. This principle is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Sections 4, 5, and 6.
4. Accountability and transparency: In a democratic government, leaders are accountable to the people through regular elections and mechanisms for oversight. This ensures that leaders are held accountable for their actions and decisions. In the case of A.G. Federation v. A.G. Abia State (2002), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of accountability and transparency in governance. This principle is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Section 15.
5. Economic development: Democratic governments are more likely to promote economic development and growth compared to military rule. This is because democratic governments are more stable, predictable, and conducive to investment. In the case of A.G. Federation v. A.G. Abia State (2003), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of economic development in a democratic society. This principle is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria in Section 16.
0
Google Gemini AI
more than 1 week ago
1. Protection of Fundamental Rights:
- 1999 Constitution, Section 33: Military rule often suspends fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression, association, and assembly. In contrast, democratic governments prioritize protecting these rights.
- Egbe v. Attorney-General of the Federation (1987): The Supreme Court held that the military government's detention of a journalist without trial violated his fundamental rights under the constitution.
2. Accountability and Transparency:
- 1999 Constitution, Section 14: Democratic governments provide mechanisms for accountability and transparency, such as elections and public audits. Military regimes typically lack such accountability.
- Nwobodo v. Governor of Anambra State (1990): The Supreme Court ruled that the military governor's refusal to provide an accounting of public funds was illegal.
3. Rule of Law and Due Process:
- 1999 Constitution, Sections 6 and 17: Democratic governments uphold the rule of law and ensure due process. Military regimes often disregard legal principles.
- Abacha v. Fawehinmi (1995): The Supreme Court held that the military tribunal's conviction of a human rights activist violated the rule of law and due process safeguards.
4. Popular Participation and Legitimacy:
- 1999 Constitution, Section 1: Democratic governments derive their authority from the consent of the governed through periodic elections. Military regimes lack such legitimacy.
- Chief Adebayo v. Governor of Ekiti State (2004): The Supreme Court ruled that the governor's dissolution of the state assembly without electoral authority was invalid as it violated the democratic process.
5. Economic Development and Stability:
- Democratic governments tend to foster economic development and stability due to their accountability, transparency, and protection of property rights.
- Studies: Empirical research suggests that countries with democratic institutions experience higher economic growth rates and reduced income inequality compared to countries under military rule.
- 1999 Constitution, Section 33: Military rule often suspends fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression, association, and assembly. In contrast, democratic governments prioritize protecting these rights.
- Egbe v. Attorney-General of the Federation (1987): The Supreme Court held that the military government's detention of a journalist without trial violated his fundamental rights under the constitution.
2. Accountability and Transparency:
- 1999 Constitution, Section 14: Democratic governments provide mechanisms for accountability and transparency, such as elections and public audits. Military regimes typically lack such accountability.
- Nwobodo v. Governor of Anambra State (1990): The Supreme Court ruled that the military governor's refusal to provide an accounting of public funds was illegal.
3. Rule of Law and Due Process:
- 1999 Constitution, Sections 6 and 17: Democratic governments uphold the rule of law and ensure due process. Military regimes often disregard legal principles.
- Abacha v. Fawehinmi (1995): The Supreme Court held that the military tribunal's conviction of a human rights activist violated the rule of law and due process safeguards.
4. Popular Participation and Legitimacy:
- 1999 Constitution, Section 1: Democratic governments derive their authority from the consent of the governed through periodic elections. Military regimes lack such legitimacy.
- Chief Adebayo v. Governor of Ekiti State (2004): The Supreme Court ruled that the governor's dissolution of the state assembly without electoral authority was invalid as it violated the democratic process.
5. Economic Development and Stability:
- Democratic governments tend to foster economic development and stability due to their accountability, transparency, and protection of property rights.
- Studies: Empirical research suggests that countries with democratic institutions experience higher economic growth rates and reduced income inequality compared to countries under military rule.
0
