>
#english
,
#reasoning
>
Five difference between deductive reasons and inductive reasons using the right example each?
Anonymous
Mar 8
Five difference between deductive reasons and inductive reasons using the right example each?
1 view
1 view
1 answer
Sort By
ChatGPT
Mar 8
1. Deductive reasoning involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles, while inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. For example, in deductive reasoning, if all humans are mortal and Socrates is a human, then Socrates must be mortal. In inductive reasoning, if every swan observed so far is white, then it can be concluded that all swans are white.
2. Deductive reasoning is considered to be more certain and reliable than inductive reasoning because the conclusions are logically derived from the premises. For example, in deductive reasoning, if it is known that all mammals have hair and a whale is a mammal, then it can be deduced that a whale has hair. In inductive reasoning, however, the conclusions are based on probability and may not always be true. For example, if all observed crows are black, it does not necessarily mean that all crows are black.
3. Deductive reasoning is used in mathematics and formal logic, where the conclusions are necessarily true if the premises are true. For example, in mathematics, if 2+2=4 and 4+4=8, then it can be deduced that 2+2+4+4=8. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, is used in scientific research and everyday decision-making, where the conclusions are based on patterns and trends observed in data. For example, based on past data, it can be inferred that smoking is linked to an increased risk of lung cancer.
4. Deductive reasoning is top-down, starting with a general principle and applying it to specific cases. For example, in deductive reasoning, if all birds have feathers and a penguin is a bird, then a penguin must have feathers. Inductive reasoning is bottom-up, starting with specific observations and generalizing to broader conclusions. For example, in inductive reasoning, if a person observes that every time they eat peanuts they get a rash, they may conclude that they have a peanut allergy.
5. Deductive reasoning is more structured and formal, with clear steps and rules to follow. For example, in deductive reasoning, the premises are stated first, followed by the conclusion. In inductive reasoning, the process is more flexible and open-ended, with the conclusions being based on the accumulation of evidence and observations. For example, in inductive reasoning, a scientist may collect data on the effects of a new drug and draw conclusions based on the trends observed in the data.
2. Deductive reasoning is considered to be more certain and reliable than inductive reasoning because the conclusions are logically derived from the premises. For example, in deductive reasoning, if it is known that all mammals have hair and a whale is a mammal, then it can be deduced that a whale has hair. In inductive reasoning, however, the conclusions are based on probability and may not always be true. For example, if all observed crows are black, it does not necessarily mean that all crows are black.
3. Deductive reasoning is used in mathematics and formal logic, where the conclusions are necessarily true if the premises are true. For example, in mathematics, if 2+2=4 and 4+4=8, then it can be deduced that 2+2+4+4=8. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, is used in scientific research and everyday decision-making, where the conclusions are based on patterns and trends observed in data. For example, based on past data, it can be inferred that smoking is linked to an increased risk of lung cancer.
4. Deductive reasoning is top-down, starting with a general principle and applying it to specific cases. For example, in deductive reasoning, if all birds have feathers and a penguin is a bird, then a penguin must have feathers. Inductive reasoning is bottom-up, starting with specific observations and generalizing to broader conclusions. For example, in inductive reasoning, if a person observes that every time they eat peanuts they get a rash, they may conclude that they have a peanut allergy.
5. Deductive reasoning is more structured and formal, with clear steps and rules to follow. For example, in deductive reasoning, the premises are stated first, followed by the conclusion. In inductive reasoning, the process is more flexible and open-ended, with the conclusions being based on the accumulation of evidence and observations. For example, in inductive reasoning, a scientist may collect data on the effects of a new drug and draw conclusions based on the trends observed in the data.
0
