How to analyse any 6 criteria that determine whether government should become involved in the provision of individual services?

1. Cost-effectiveness: Analyze whether the government's involvement in providing individual services would be more cost-effective than leaving it to the private sector. Consider factors such as economies of scale, administrative costs, and potential savings for taxpayers.

2. Equity: Evaluate whether government intervention would help to ensure that all individuals have equal access to essential services, regardless of their income or social status. Consider whether the private sector is adequately serving marginalized or vulnerable populations.

3. Market failure: Assess whether there are market failures that justify government intervention in the provision of individual services. This could include situations where there is a lack of competition, information asymmetry, or externalities that are not being addressed by the private sector.

4. Public interest: Consider whether the provision of individual services is in the public interest and aligns with the government's policy objectives. Evaluate whether government involvement would help to achieve social goals such as improving public health, reducing poverty, or promoting economic development.

5. Regulatory capacity: Evaluate whether the government has the regulatory capacity to effectively oversee and monitor the provision of individual services. Consider whether there are adequate safeguards in place to protect consumers and ensure quality standards are met.

6. Political feasibility: Assess whether there is political support for government involvement in the provision of individual services. Consider the potential opposition from vested interests in the private sector, as well as public opinion and the government's overall policy agenda.