What are the Characteristics of literature review?

1. Comprehensive: A literature review should provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research and literature on a particular topic.

2. Critical: A literature review should not only summarize the existing literature but also critically evaluate and analyze it. This involves identifying strengths and weaknesses in the research, pointing out gaps in the literature, and discussing conflicting findings.

3. Objective: A literature review should be objective and unbiased, presenting the information in a neutral and balanced manner.

4. Systematic: A literature review should be conducted in a systematic and organized manner, following a clear methodology and search strategy.

5. Synthesis: A literature review should synthesize the findings from different studies and sources to provide a coherent and integrated overview of the topic.

6. Relevant: A literature review should focus on the most relevant and up-to-date sources of information, ensuring that the review is current and informative.

7. Clear and concise: A literature review should be well-written, clear, and concise, presenting the information in a logical and coherent manner.

8. Structured: A literature review should have a clear structure, with an introduction, main body, and conclusion, as well as headings and subheadings to guide the reader through the review.

Characteristics of a Literature Review:

1. Comprehensive:
- Covers a wide range of relevant sources, including academic journals, books, and other scholarly publications.
- Provides a thorough overview of the existing research on the topic.

2. Critical:
- Evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the sources reviewed.
- Identifies areas of agreement and disagreement among researchers.
- Synthesizes the findings to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

3. Focused:
- Addresses a specific research question or thesis statement.
- Stays within the scope of the research topic and does not deviate into unrelated areas.

4. Organized:
- Presents the findings in a logical and coherent structure.
- Uses headings, subheadings, and transitions to guide the reader through the review.

5. Well-Documented:
- Provides clear references for all sources cited.
- Follows a consistent citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago.

6. Scholarly:
- Uses formal language and tone.
- Avoids personal opinions or biases.
- Presents the findings in an objective and unbiased manner.

7. Annotated (Optional):
- Includes brief summaries or critiques of the sources reviewed.
- Helps the reader quickly identify relevant sources and understand their key findings.

8. Up-to-Date:
- Reviews recent research and scholarly publications.
- In some cases, may include a brief discussion of ongoing or emerging research.

9. Objective:
- Avoids subjective language and presents the findings in a fair and impartial manner.
- Acknowledges any limitations or potential biases in the sources reviewed.

10. Purposeful:
- Provides a clear rationale for the review and explains its significance to the research or field of study.