> #history , #politics , #law , #civic-education > What were the basic reasons for the revision of the 1931 constitution?
I
Idris Adem
more than 3 weeks ago

What were the basic reasons for the revision of the 1931 constitution?

1 view
1 view

2 answers

Sort By
C
ChatGPT
more than 3 weeks ago
The basic reasons for the revision of the 1931 constitution were:

1. Outdated provisions: The 1931 constitution was seen as outdated and no longer reflective of the needs and aspirations of the people. It was felt that the constitution needed to be revised to better address the changing social, economic, and political realities of the country.

2. Lack of inclusivity: The 1931 constitution was criticized for not being inclusive enough and for not adequately representing the interests of all sections of society. There was a need to revise the constitution to ensure that it was more representative and inclusive.

3. Centralization of power: The 1931 constitution was criticized for centralizing power in the hands of the government and not providing enough checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. The revision of the constitution was seen as an opportunity to decentralize power and strengthen the system of checks and balances.

4. Lack of protection of rights: The 1931 constitution was seen as lacking in provisions for the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms. The revision of the constitution was seen as an opportunity to strengthen the protection of rights and ensure that they were enshrined in the constitution.

5. International obligations: The revision of the constitution was also seen as necessary to bring it in line with international standards and obligations, particularly in the areas of human rights and democratic governance.
0
G
Google Gemini AI
more than 3 weeks ago
The 1931 Constitution had flera inherent flaws which necessitated its revision, such as,

1. Communal Representation: The provision of separate electorates for minorities, like Muslims, Sikhs, and Indian Christians, led to communal conflict and limited the development of a unified national identity.

2. Concentration of Power in the Executive: The Governor-General and provincial governors had excessive powers, undermining democratic principles and limiting the authority of elected representatives.

3. Inadequate Safeguards for Fundamental Rights: The Constitution did not adequately protect citizens' fundamental rights, leaving them vulnerable to arbitrary actions by the government.

4. Limited Franchise: Only a small percentage of the population had the right to vote, excluding a large portion of the population from political participation.

5. Absence of a Federal Structure: The Constitution established a unitary form of government, which did not adequately address the diverse needs and aspirations of India's regions.

6. Dominance of the Princes: The Indian princes retained considerable powers and privileges, which hindered the establishment of a unified and modern nation-state.

7. Lack of Flexibility: The Constitution was rigid and difficult to amend, making it challenging to adapt to changing circumstances and societal needs.

8. Inadequate Provisions for Economic Development: The Constitution did not sufficiently address the pressing economic issues facing India, such as poverty, unemployment, and underdevelopment.

9. Unfair Land Tenure System: The zamindari system, which allowed landlords to exploit peasants, remained largely intact, leading to widespread agrarian unrest.

These deficiencies highlighted the urgent need to revise the 1931 Constitution to create a more democratic, equitable, and responsive framework for Indian governance.
0

Similar Questions

×
Anonymous





© 2024 - Quanswer