What were the Theological implications of affirming either one or two wills/energies of Christ? In simple English term??

The theological implications of affirming one will/energy of Christ is that it emphasizes the unity of Christ's divine and human natures. This view suggests that Christ acted with a single will or energy that was in perfect harmony with both his divine and human aspects.

On the other hand, affirming two wills/energies of Christ suggests a distinction between his divine and human natures. This view acknowledges that Christ had both a divine will and a human will, which could sometimes be in tension with each other.

Ultimately, the debate over one or two wills/energies of Christ has implications for understanding the nature of Christ and how his divine and human aspects interacted during his earthly ministry.